Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.5 | 85.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-11-19 | 2020-10-16 |
| 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches | 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| Clearly white and Just black | Fusion black, Fusion blue and Fusion green |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 500.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 416 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| -- | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3885mAh Battery | 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.84 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4a 5G has an overall score of 87.5, which is a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy F41's 85.2 score. The Google Pixel 4a 5G is a a bit thinner and lighter cellphone than the Samsung Galaxy F41, even though both of them were only released with a couple of months difference. These devices work with the same Android 11 OS (Operating System).
The Samsung Galaxy F41 counts with a processing unit that is just as good as the processor in Google Pixel 4a 5G, both of them have 8 cpu cores and the same RAM amount. Samsung Galaxy F41 counts with just a bit better looking display than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has a just a bit inferior pixel count per inch in the display, and they both have an equal resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels, the Samsung Galaxy F41 also counts with a little larger display.
The Galaxy F41 has a bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with an external SD slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB. The Samsung Galaxy F41 features a very superior battery lifetime than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because it has a 6000mAh battery size.
Galaxy F41 takes better videos and photos than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not so good for low light captures and video and worse 30 frames per second video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Galaxy F41 also counts with a much bigger camera sensor capturing way better quality pictures and videos and a much more mega-pixels camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.