Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.5 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11 | Android 11 |
| 2020-11-19 | 2021-02-22 |
| 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 7.69 ounces |
| Clearly white and Just black | Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 500.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 416 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Exynos 9825 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3885mAh Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.84 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy F62 has a general score of 88.1, which is a little bit better than the Google Pixel 4a 5G's score of 87.5. Both phones in this comparison review come with the same Android 11 OS, so both of them should give you identical operating system features. Even being the best cellphone we are comparing, the Galaxy F62 is a somewhat thicker and noticeably heavier cellphone than the Google Pixel 4a 5G.
Samsung Galaxy F62 features just a bit better screen than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has a just a bit less pixels per inch of display, it also counts with a quite larger screen and a slightly higher 1080 x 2400 resolution. Google Pixel 4a 5G features a little bit better hardware performance than Galaxy F62, and although they both have 6 GB of RAM, the Google Pixel 4a 5G also has more cores (but slower).
Samsung Galaxy F62 has a much bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Google Pixel 4a 5G, and although they both have the same internal memory capacity, the Samsung Galaxy F62 also has a SD memory slot that admits a maximum of 1 TB. Samsung Galaxy F62 features a much better battery duration than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because it has 7000mAh of battery capacity.
Galaxy F62 captures much better videos and photos than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has slower 30 fps video frame rate and a smaller camera aperture, and they both have the same video resolution, the Galaxy F62 also counts with a way larger back camera sensor and a way higher resolution back-facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.