Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.5 | 78.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2020-11-19 | 2019-02-05 |
| 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches | 6.16 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Clearly white and Just black | Charcoal black and Ocean blue |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 500.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 416 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 9.36 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 12.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 9.02 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3885mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.84 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4a 5G is better than the Samsung Galaxy M20, with a general score of 87.5 against 78.9. The Google Pixel 4a 5G design is newer, just a little lighter and a little thinner than the Samsung Galaxy M20. Both of these phones work with Android OS, but Google Pixel 4a 5G has the newer 11 version and Samsung Galaxy M20 has Android 10.
The Google Pixel 4a 5G has a bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy M20, and although they both have 8 cores, the Google Pixel 4a 5G also has more RAM. The Google Pixel 4a 5G features a slightly better screen than Samsung Galaxy M20, because although it has a little smaller display, and they both have the same 1080 x 2340 resolution, the Google Pixel 4a 5G also counts with a just a little higher count of pixels in each inch of display.
Google Pixel 4a 5G has a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy M20, because although it has a worse resolution camera, it also counts with a bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing better quality videos and photographs, a larger aperture to take better photography in low light situations and a much higher 3840x2160 video definition.
The Galaxy M20 counts with a bigger storage to store more games and applications than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with an external SD slot that admits up to 512 GB. Samsung Galaxy M20 has superior battery life than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because it has a 29 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.