Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.5 | 80.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2020-11-19 | 2017-07-07 |
| 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches | 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Clearly white and Just black | Black, Blue, Gold and Silver |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 500.00 | $ 611.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 416 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-T880 MP12 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3885mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.84 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4a 5G has a global score of 87.5, which is just a bit better than Galaxy Note Fan Edition's global score of 80.4. The Google Pixel 4a 5G is a notably newer cellphone than the Galaxy Note Fan Edition, but it is just a little thicker and just a little heavier. The Google Pixel 4a 5G counts with a little faster CPU than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Google Pixel 4a 5G also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
The Galaxy Note Fan Edition features a little bit better looking display than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution and a little higher pixels density. The Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition has just a bit more memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that holds a maximum of 256 GB.
Google Pixel 4a 5G takes a little bit better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has a smaller sensor providing a worse image quality, and they both have the same camera aperture and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Google Pixel 4a 5G also counts with a camera with a better 12.2 mega pixels resolution and faster 60 fps video frame rates.
The Google Pixel 4a 5G counts with improved battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has a 3885mAh battery size.
In addition to being the best phone in our current comparison, Google Pixel 4a 5G is also a bargain compared to the other ones, which makes it very easy to pick between these phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.