Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.5 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2020-11-19 | 2016-08-02 |
| 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches | 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Clearly white and Just black | Black onyx, Blue coral, Gold platinum and Silver titanium |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 500.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 416 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.36 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3885mAh Battery | 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.84 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4a 5G has a global score of 87.5, which is much better than Galaxy Note7's 79.5 overall score. The Google Pixel 4a 5G design is notably newer and a bit lighter than Galaxy Note7's, although it's also a bit thicker. Google Pixel 4a 5G features a bit faster processor than Samsung Galaxy Note7, because it has 4 more cores and 2 GB more RAM.
The Samsung Galaxy Note7 features a bit better looking screen than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px and a just a bit greater amount of pixels in each display inch. The Google Pixel 4a 5G shoots just a bit better photographs and videos than Galaxy Note7, because although it has a tinier sensor taking less light and washed colors, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a F1.7 aperture, the Google Pixel 4a 5G also counts with a better resolution camera and faster video frame rate.
Samsung Galaxy Note7 has a slightly bigger storage capacity for applications and games than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with a SD card slot that holds up to 256 GB. Google Pixel 4a 5G has just a bit better battery duration than Galaxy Note7, because it has an 11% bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.