Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.5 | 76.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11 | Android 9.0 Pie, 7.1 Nougat |
| 2020-11-19 | 2018-01-09 |
| 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches | 5.97 x 2.95 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Clearly white and Just black | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 500.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| OLED | TFT |
| 416 pixels per inch | 401 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-T830 MP1 GPU |
| 9.36 | 8.82 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 9.13 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3885mAh Battery | 3300mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.84 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4a 5G is better than Samsung Galaxy On7 Prime, getting an 87.5 score against 76.9. The Google Pixel 4a 5G is a a lot newer and a little lighter phone than the Samsung Galaxy On7 Prime, but it is also a little bit thicker. These devices work with Android OS, but the Google Pixel 4a 5G has the older 11 version and Samsung Galaxy On7 Prime has Android 9.0 Pie version.
Google Pixel 4a 5G counts with just a little better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy On7 Prime, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Google Pixel 4a 5G also has 2 GB more RAM memory. The Google Pixel 4a 5G features a bit better looking screen than Galaxy On7 Prime, because it has a little larger display, a quite better 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution and a just a bit better count of pixels in each inch in the screen.
Galaxy On7 Prime features a slightly better memory capacity to store more games and applications than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD card slot that holds up to 256 GB. The Google Pixel 4a 5G shoots better photographs and videos than Galaxy On7 Prime, because although it has a camera in the back with a worse resolution, it also counts with a lot better (4K) video quality, a bigger aperture and a bigger back camera sensor capturing better quality videos and pictures.
The Google Pixel 4a 5G has superior battery lifetime than Galaxy On7 Prime, because it has a 3885mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.