Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.5 | 88.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-11-19 | 2019-03-08 |
| 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches | 5.90 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Clearly white and Just black | Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green and Prism white |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 500.00 | $ 281.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 416 pixels per inch | 551 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3885mAh Battery | 3400mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.84 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S10 is a bit better than Google Pixel 4a 5G, getting a general score of 88.3 against 87.5. Both phones in this comparison review work with the same Android 11 OS, so you shouldn't perceive any differences regarding OS features. Galaxy S10's construction is a little lighter and a little bit thinner than the Google Pixel 4a 5G, despite of the fact that it was released about a year before.
Galaxy S10 features a bit faster processing unit than Google Pixel 4a 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy S10 also has a larger amount of RAM memory. Galaxy S10 features a little more vivid screen than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a better pixels quantity per inch of display and a higher resolution of 1440 x 3040.
Samsung Galaxy S10 has a camera that's very similar to the Google Pixel 4a 5G one, because although the Samsung Galaxy S10 has a lower 3840x2160 video definition and a lower resolution back camera, and they both have the same back-facing camera sensor size, it also counts with a bigger camera aperture to capture better low light photography and videos.
The Galaxy S10 counts with a much greater memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Pixel 4a 5G, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage, the Galaxy S10 also has a SD memory card expansion slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB. Google Pixel 4a 5G features just a bit better battery life than Galaxy S10, because it has a 3885mAh battery capacity.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones we are comparing here, the Samsung Galaxy S10 is also by far the cheapest, which makes it an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.