Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.5 | 93.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-11-19 | 2019-05-16 |
| 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches | 6.40 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Clearly white and Just black | Crown silver, Majestic black and Royal gold |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 500.00 | $ 342.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 416 pixels per inch | 502 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3885mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.84 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S10 5G is a little bit better than Google Pixel 4a 5G, getting a general score of 93.6 against 87.5. These phones include the same Android 11 OS, so you shouldn't see any difference regarding that. Despite of the fact Galaxy S10 5G is older and somewhat heavier than Google Pixel 4a 5G, it's construction is still a little bit thinner.
Galaxy S10 5G has a slightly better screen than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because it has a higher 1440 x 3040px resolution, a little bit higher screen density and a bit bigger screen. The Galaxy S10 5G has a much better storage capacity to store more games and applications than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because it has 128 GB more internal storage.
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G has a bit better hardware performance than Google Pixel 4a 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Samsung Galaxy S10 5G also has a higher amount of RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy S10 5G's camera is just as good as the camera in Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although the Samsung Galaxy S10 5G has a worse 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a back-facing camera with a worse 12 MP resolution, and they both have the same back camera sensor size, it also counts with a bigger camera aperture to capture better captures and videos in low light situations.
The Galaxy S10 5G counts with a bit longer battery duration than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G is not only the best phones of the ones we compare here, but it's also very cheap compared to the other ones, making this phone an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.