Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.5 | 89.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2020-11-19 | 2020-02-03 |
| 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches | 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Clearly white and Just black | Prism black, Prism blue and Prism white |
| Plastic | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 500.00 | $ 279.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 416 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3885mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.84 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S10 Lite is slightly better than Google Pixel 4a 5G, having a global score of 89.7 against 87.5. The Galaxy S10 Lite body has the same thickness than the Google Pixel 4a 5G, but it is just a little bit heavier. Galaxy S10 Lite has a little faster processor than Google Pixel 4a 5G, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy S10 Lite also has a higher amount of RAM.
The Google Pixel 4a 5G features a slightly better looking screen than Galaxy S10 Lite, because although it has a bit smaller display and a little worse resolution of 1080 x 2340px, it also counts with a bit more pixels per screen inch. Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite has a much better camera than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is worse for taking images in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same 60 fps video frame rates and the same video definition, the Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite also counts with a lot bigger sensor providing a way better image quality and a back facing camera with a way higher 48 megapixels resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite counts with a way bigger memory capacity for applications and games than Google Pixel 4a 5G, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory capacity, the Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite also has an external memory card slot that allows up to 1000 GB. Galaxy S10 Lite has a bit better battery lifetime than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 3885mAh.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones we compare here, the Galaxy S10 Lite is also by far the cheapest, making this phone a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.