Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.5 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2020-11-19 | 2019-03-08 |
| 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches | 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 5.29 ounces |
| Clearly white and Just black | Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 500.00 | $ 408.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 416 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3885mAh Battery | 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.84 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4a 5G has a general score of 87.5, which is a little bit better than Galaxy S10e's score of 86.3. Although the Google Pixel 4a 5G is newer than the Galaxy S10e, it's just a little bit thicker and heavier. The Galaxy S10e counts with just a bit better hardware performance than Google Pixel 4a 5G. They have the same number of cores and 6 GB of RAM.
The Galaxy S10e has a little bit better display than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has a little worse 1080 x 2280px resolution and a little smaller screen, it also counts with a bit better pixel density. Galaxy S10e's camera is very similar to the camera in Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although the Galaxy S10e has a lower resolution back-facing camera and a worse 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, and they both have a 0.39 inches sensor, it also counts with a larger camera aperture to take better captures and video in low light environments.
Galaxy S10e has a lot bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Google Pixel 4a 5G, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage, the Galaxy S10e also has a SD extension slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB. The Google Pixel 4a 5G features greater battery performance than Galaxy S10e, because it has a 3885mAh battery capacity against 3100mAh.
Although Google Pixel 4a 5G is a better device, it is more expensive than the Galaxy S10e, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Galaxy S10e. So if you want that extra features and specs, you can buy the Google Pixel 4a 5G, otherwise you can save some dollars and get the Galaxy S10e, giving up some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.