Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.5 | 89.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11 | Android 11 |
| 2020-11-19 | 2022-01-11 |
| 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches | 6.13 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Clearly white and Just black | -- |
| Plastic | Metal and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 500.00 | $ 700.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 416 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3885mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.84 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S21 FE is a bit better than Google Pixel 4a 5G, with a overall score of 89.1 against 87.5. Although Galaxy S21 FE is a little heavier than the Google Pixel 4a 5G, it's just a little bit thinner and also newer. Both of these phones have the same Android 11 OS, so you shouldn't perceive any differences in that aspect.
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE features a display that is just as good as the display in Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although the Samsung Galaxy S21 FE has a just a little lower pixels density, and they both have the same exact 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution, it also counts with a little bit larger display.
Galaxy S21 FE counts with as much storage capacity to store more apps and games as Google Pixel 4a 5G, both have equal 128 GB internal storage. The Samsung Galaxy S21 FE features just a bit better processing power than Google Pixel 4a 5G. They have the same RAM amount and 8 cpu cores. The Google Pixel 4a 5G features a little bit better camera than Galaxy S21 FE, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and the same video frame rate, the Google Pixel 4a 5G also has a higher 12.2 megapixels resolution camera and a bigger diafragm aperture.
Galaxy S21 FE counts with a bit longer battery life than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Although Samsung Galaxy S21 FE is a better device, it costs more than Google Pixel 4a 5G, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Google Pixel 4a 5G. If you want to save some money, you can buy Google Pixel 4a 5G, and give up some specs and features, but you will get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.