Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.5 | 95.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11 | Android 13, 12 |
| 2020-11-19 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches | 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 8.08 ounces |
| Clearly white and Just black | Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 500.00 | $ 1200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 416 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1750 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3885mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.84 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S22 Ultra has a general score of 95.4, which is slightly better than the Google Pixel 4a 5G's 87.5 general score. These phones have Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy S22 Ultra has newer 13 version and Google Pixel 4a 5G has Android 11, providing you lots of additional features. Even though Galaxy S22 Ultra is newer than Google Pixel 4a 5G, it is incredibly heavier and just a little bit thicker.
The Google Pixel 4a 5G and the Galaxy S22 Ultra count with similar processors, and although the Galaxy S22 Ultra has a higher amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. Galaxy S22 Ultra features a much sharper screen than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because it has a bit better pixel density, a higher resolution of 1440 x 3088px and a little bit larger display.
The Galaxy S22 Ultra has as much memory for apps and games as the Google Pixel 4a 5G, both of them have the same internal memory capacity. The Galaxy S22 Ultra has a way better camera than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has a smaller aperture, it also counts with a lot better video definition, a back camera with a lot better resolution and a way larger back camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has improved battery duration than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Although Galaxy S22 Ultra is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Google Pixel 4a 5G, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Google Pixel 4a 5G. So if you need that extra specs and features, you can buy Galaxy S22 Ultra, otherwise you can save some money and buy the Google Pixel 4a 5G, giving up a couple specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.