Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.5 | 82.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11 | Android 14 |
| 2020-11-19 | -- |
| 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches | -- |
| 5.93 ounces | -- |
| Clearly white and Just black | -- |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 500.00 | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 416 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 12.54 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3885mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.84 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4a 5G has an overall score of 87.5, which is just a bit better than Galaxy S25's general score of 82.6. Both phones in this comparison review use Android OS, but Google Pixel 4a 5G has the previous 11 version while Galaxy S25 has Android 14 version. The Galaxy S25 counts with a more vivid screen than Google Pixel 4a 5G. They have a better count of pixels per screen inch, a display with the same size and exactly the same resolution of 1080 x 2340.
Google Pixel 4a 5G and Galaxy S25 have similar storage capacity to install games and applications, both of them have equal internal memory capacity. The Google Pixel 4a 5G features a very superior hardware performance than Galaxy S25, although it has less RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. Galaxy S25 has just a bit longer battery lifetime than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because it has a 4000mAh battery size.
Samsung Galaxy S25 counts with a way better camera than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not good for shooting photographs and/or video in low-light environments, it also counts with a lot more megapixels camera in the back, a lot bigger back camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a lot better video quality.
Google Pixel 4a 5G not only is the best phones of the ones in this comparison, but it's also a bargain compared to others, making it a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.