Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.5 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11 | Android 14 |
| 2020-11-19 | -- |
| 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches | -- |
| 5.93 ounces | -- |
| Clearly white and Just black | -- |
| Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 500.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 416 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 14.74 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3885mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.84 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra is a little bit better than Google Pixel 4a 5G, with a general score of 90.7 against 87.5. These devices work with Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has 14 version and Google Pixel 4a 5G has Android 11, so it provides the user a lot of extra features and a performance increase. Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra's construction is much lighter and thinner than the Google Pixel 4a 5G.
The Galaxy S25 Ultra features a much more vibrant screen than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because it has a better resolution of 1440 x 3088 pixels, a just a bit better screen density and a quite bigger display. Google Pixel 4a 5G counts with a much greater hardware performance than Galaxy S25 Ultra, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
The Galaxy S25 Ultra captures way better photographs and videos than Google Pixel 4a 5G, and although they both have a same size diafragm aperture, the Galaxy S25 Ultra also has a way higher video resolution, a lot larger back camera sensor capturing way better quality photographs and a back facing camera with lot more megapixels.
The Galaxy S25 Ultra features a much bigger memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because it has 256 GB internal memory. Galaxy S25 Ultra has better battery life than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.