Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.5 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11 | Android 4.4.2 |
| 2020-11-19 | 2014-06-23 |
| 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches | 5.67 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Clearly white and Just black | Blue and Red |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 500.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 416 pixels per inch | 432 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.2 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974-AC chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 16 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 6.72 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | SIM |
| 10.7 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3885mAh Battery | 2800mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | 390 hours standby time 21 hours talk time |
| 5.84 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4a 5G has a general score of 87.5, which is much better than Galaxy S5 Sport's 77.8 general score. Both of these devices use Android OS (Operating System), but the Google Pixel 4a 5G has the older 11 version and Galaxy S5 Sport has Android 4.4.2. Even though Google Pixel 4a 5G is a bit heavier than Galaxy S5 Sport, it's a little thinner and notably newer.
The Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport features a better looking display than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has a bit lower resolution of 1920 x 1080px and a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a just a little better pixels number per inch in the screen. The Galaxy S5 Sport and Google Pixel 4a 5G both have really similar processors, because although the Galaxy S5 Sport has 4 GB less RAM and 4 less processing cores , it also counts with an extra GPU.
The Google Pixel 4a 5G features a much better memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy S5 Sport, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 112 GB more internal memory. Google Pixel 4a 5G takes clearer photos and videos than Galaxy S5 Sport, because although it has a lower video resolution and a lot lower 12.2 mega pixels resolution back-facing camera, it also counts with a lot bigger aperture and a larger back-facing camera sensor shooting better quality videos and pictures.
The Google Pixel 4a 5G features a really longer battery duration than Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has 3885mAh of battery capacity.
The Google Pixel 4a 5G is a lot more expensive than Galaxy S5 Sport, but you can get a better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.