Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.5 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2020-11-19 | 2016-06-10 |
| 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches | 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Clearly white and Just black | Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 500.00 | $ 247.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 416 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.36 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3885mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.84 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4a 5G has an overall score of 87.5, which is much better than the Galaxy S7 Active's 75.8 score. The Google Pixel 4a 5G is a newer device, and it is also just a bit lighter and somewhat thinner than the Galaxy S7 Active. Google Pixel 4a 5G counts with a little better performance than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because it has 4 more cpu cores and a higher amount of RAM.
Samsung Galaxy S7 Active counts with a much better screen than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a greater pixel amount per screen inch and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560. Google Pixel 4a 5G features more storage for games and applications than Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with more internal memory.
Google Pixel 4a 5G takes a little bit better pictures and videos than Galaxy S7 Active, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same camera aperture, the Google Pixel 4a 5G also has faster video frame rate and a better 12.2 megapixels resolution camera in the back.
Galaxy S7 Active has just a little better battery duration than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity.
The Google Pixel 4a 5G costs a lot more than the Galaxy S7 Active, but you can get a better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.