Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.5 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-11-19 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Clearly white and Just black | Black |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 500.00 | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 416 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3885mAh Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.84 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4a 5G is a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, with a score of 87.5 against 81. Google Pixel 4a 5G's construction is newer, notably lighter and somewhat thinner than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro. These phones have the same Android 11 OS (operating system), so both should offer identical operating system features.
Google Pixel 4a 5G has a little faster processor than Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Google Pixel 4a 5G also has 2 GB more RAM memory. Google Pixel 4a 5G features a little sharper display than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a little bit smaller display, and they both have exactly the same resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels, the Google Pixel 4a 5G also counts with a bit more pixels per inch of screen.
Google Pixel 4a 5G has a slightly better camera than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a back-facing camera with a much worse resolution, and they both have a same size aperture, the Google Pixel 4a 5G also counts with a much larger back-facing camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a much better (4K) video quality.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has a quite bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that admits a maximum of 512 GB. The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro features a little better battery performance than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because it has 4050mAh of battery capacity.
The Google Pixel 4a 5G is more expensive than the Galaxy XCover Pro, but it's still a good choice, because you can get a lot more for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.