Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.5 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11 | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2020-11-19 | 2020-02-14 |
| 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Clearly white and Just black | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 500.00 | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 416 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3885mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.84 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip is just a bit better than Google Pixel 4a 5G, getting an 88.5 score against 87.5. Both of these devices use Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy Z Flip has a newer 12 version and Google Pixel 4a 5G has Android 11. Although Galaxy Z Flip is older and a little heavier than the Google Pixel 4a 5G, it's design is still somewhat thinner.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip counts with a bit better performance than Google Pixel 4a 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip also has more RAM. The Galaxy Z Flip counts with a little sharper screen than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because it has a little bigger display, a just a little better pixel number in each display inch and a slightly better 1080 x 2636 pixels resolution.
Galaxy Z Flip's camera is just as good as the camera in Google Pixel 4a 5G, and although the Galaxy Z Flip has a less megapixels resolution camera, a smaller aperture which is not favorable for taking photographs or videos in low light environments and a lower (4K) video quality, they both have the same back camera sensor size.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip features a superior memory capacity to store more apps and games than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because it has 128 GB more internal memory capacity. The Google Pixel 4a 5G has longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because it has an 18% more battery capacity.
Although Samsung Galaxy Z Flip is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Google Pixel 4a 5G, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Google Pixel 4a 5G. If you want to save a few dollars, you can get the Google Pixel 4a 5G, giving up a few features and specifications, but you will get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.