Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.5 | 92.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-11-19 | 2020-08-07 |
| 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Clearly white and Just black | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white |
| Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 500.00 | $ 603.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 416 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3885mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.84 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip 5G is a bit better than the Google Pixel 4a 5G, getting a general score of 92.3 against 87.5. The Galaxy Z Flip 5G construction is a bit heavier but thinner than the Google Pixel 4a 5G, and both were released only a few months apart. Both phones we compare here have the same Android 11 OS (operating system), so both of them should give identical operating system features.
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a little more vivid screen than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because it has a little bit better display pixel density, a quite better 1080 x 2636 resolution and a little larger display. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a much bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because it has 256 GB internal memory.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a bit better CPU than Google Pixel 4a 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has a higher amount of RAM. Google Pixel 4a 5G counts with improved battery performance than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has an 18 percent more battery size.
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G's camera is just as good as the camera in Google Pixel 4a 5G, and although the Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a less MP camera, a tinier diafragm aperture and a worse video quality, they both have a 0.39 inches back camera sensor.
Galaxy Z Flip 5G is more expensive than the Google Pixel 4a 5G, but you can get a better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.