Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.5 | 87.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2020-11-19 | 2020-10-12 |
| 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches | 6.22 x 2.68 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Clearly white and Just black | Black, Blue and Grey |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 500.00 | $ 848.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 416 pixels per inch | 449 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3885mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.84 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4a 5G is a little bit better than Xperia 5 II, having an 87.5 score against 87.2. Even being the best device in this comparison review, Google Pixel 4a 5G is an a little bit heavier and a little bit thicker device than the Xperia 5 II. The Xperia 5 II has a little better hardware performance than Google Pixel 4a 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Xperia 5 II also has a greater amount of RAM.
Xperia 5 II features just a bit better looking display than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a bit greater display pixel density and a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2520px. The Sony Xperia 5 II counts with a superior memory to store more apps and games than Google Pixel 4a 5G, and although they both have the same internal memory, the Sony Xperia 5 II also has a SD memory card expansion slot that holds up to 1000 GB.
The Sony Xperia 5 II counts with just a bit better camera than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has a camera in the back with lesser MP and a lower video definition, and they both have a same size aperture, the Sony Xperia 5 II also counts with a lot larger sensor capturing lot better quality pictures and videos.
Xperia 5 II has a bit longer battery performance than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because it has a 3% bigger battery capacity.
Even being the best phone between the ones we are comparing, the Google Pixel 4a 5G is also very cheap compared to the other phones, which makes it very easy to pick between these phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.