Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.5 | 82.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2020-11-19 | 2018-07-30 |
| 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches | 6.22 x 3.15 x 0.47 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 8.32 ounces |
| Clearly white and Just black | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 500.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3840 x 2160 pixels (4K) |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 416 pixels per inch | 760 pixels per inch |
| -- | 900 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 10.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3885mAh Battery | 3540mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.84 | 5.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4a 5G has a global score of 87.5, which is a bit better than Xperia XZ2 Premium's 82.2 global score. Google Pixel 4a 5G's construction is incredibly newer, lighter and way thinner than Xperia XZ2 Premium. The Xperia XZ2 Premium has a little better hardware performance than Google Pixel 4a 5G. They have 8 cores and a 6 GB RAM memory.
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium features a way better screen than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a lot higher display density and a lot better 2160 x 3840px resolution. The Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium features a little bit better camera than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has slower video frame rates and a tinier aperture which is not favorable for taking images or video in low-light environments, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium also counts with a bigger back-facing camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a back camera with a way higher resolution.
The Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium features a quite bigger memory for apps and games than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that supports up to 400 GB. Google Pixel 4a 5G features just a little better battery duration than Xperia XZ2 Premium, because it has a 10% greater battery capacity.
In addition to being the best phone in this comparison, the Google Pixel 4a 5G is also a bargain compared to others.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.