Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.5 | 77.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2020-11-19 | 2017-04-05 |
| 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches | 5.75 x 2.83 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 5.68 ounces |
| Clearly white and Just black | Black, Blue and Silver |
| Plastic | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 500.00 | $ 700.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 416 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 8.88 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (960 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3885mAh Battery | 2900mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.84 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4a 5G is better than the Sony Xperia XZs, having an 87.5 score against 77.2. The Google Pixel 4a 5G construction has the same thickness than the Sony Xperia XZs, but it is a little bit heavier. The Google Pixel 4a 5G has a bit better processor than Sony Xperia XZs, because it has a greater number of cores and more RAM.
The Google Pixel 4a 5G features a bit more vivid screen than Xperia XZs, because although it has a quite inferior pixels quantity in each inch of display, it also counts with a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2340 and a larger display. Google Pixel 4a 5G counts with a bigger storage capacity for applications and games than Xperia XZs, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity.
The Google Pixel 4a 5G features superior battery lifetime than Sony Xperia XZs, because it has a 34% larger battery capacity. The Sony Xperia XZs features a much better camera than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has a smaller aperture which is worse for low light photos, and they both have the same video quality, the Sony Xperia XZs also counts with higher video frame rate, a way more mega pixels back-facing camera and a bigger sensor taking better quality videos and pictures.
Google Pixel 4a 5G not only is the best phones of the ones we are comparing, but it's also very cheap compared to the other ones, which makes this phone a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.