Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.5 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Android 11 | Android 11 |
| 2020-11-19 | 2021-04-20 |
| 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches | 6.46 x 2.87 x 0.36 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Clearly white and Just black | Marine Blue and Moondust Gray |
| Plastic | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 500.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 416 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 18.62 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3885mAh Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.84 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4a 5G has a general score of 87.5, which is better than the TCL 20 Pro 5G's 76.1 general score. Both devices in this comparison use the same Android 11 operating system, so you shouldn't notice any differences regarding OS features. Google Pixel 4a 5G's body is somewhat thinner and lighter than the TCL 20 Pro 5G, even when both were only released with a couple months difference.
The Google Pixel 4a 5G features just a little better processing power than TCL 20 Pro 5G. Both have 8 processing cores and a 6 GB RAM memory. Google Pixel 4a 5G features a little more vivid screen than TCL 20 Pro 5G, because although it has a little worse resolution of 1080 x 2340px and a little smaller display, it also counts with a bit more pixels per display inch.
The TCL 20 Pro 5G features a lot bigger memory to install games and applications than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because it has more internal memory capacity and an external memory slot that admits up to 1 TB. The TCL 20 Pro 5G counts with a little longer battery life than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 3885mAh.
TCL 20 Pro 5G counts with a superior camera than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not recommended for low-light photos and videos and slower 30 fps video frame rates, and they both have the same (4K) video quality, the TCL 20 Pro 5G also counts with a way bigger sensor which gives a way better image and video quality and a camera with a much better resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.