Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.5 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 11 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-11-19 | 2019-10-20 |
| 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches | 6.44 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| Clearly white and Just black | Iceberg grey and Shadow black |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 500.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 416 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| -- | 430 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3885mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.84 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4a 5G has a global score of 87.5, which is a little bit better than the Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro's 82.9 score. These devices come with Android OS, but the Google Pixel 4a 5G has older 11 version and Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro has Android 9.0 Pie. The Google Pixel 4a 5G construction is newer, a little thinner and lighter than the Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro counts with a little more vivid display than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has a just a little less pixels per inch of display, and they both have exactly the same resolution of 1080 x 2340, the Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro also counts with a little bit bigger screen.
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro has a bit more powerful processing unit than Google Pixel 4a 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro also has 2 GB more RAM memory. The Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro has a better camera than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has a smaller camera aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same video frame rates, the Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro also counts with a back facing camera with lot more megapixels and a way bigger back camera sensor which offers a way higher photo and video quality.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro's storage to store more apps and games is just as good as Google Pixel 4a 5G's one, both have equal internal storage. The Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro counts with a little better battery life than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.