Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.5 | 78.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 11 | Android 12 |
| 2020-11-19 | 2022-04-04 |
| 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches | 6.45 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Clearly white and Just black | Black and White |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 500.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 416 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 7.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 12.65 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3885mAh Battery | 4650mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.84 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4a 5G is better than the Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro, having a overall score of 87.5 against 78.7. Although the Google Pixel 4a 5G is older than the Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro, it's construction is way lighter and thinner. Both of these phones work with Android OS (operating system), but Google Pixel 4a 5G has the previous 11 version while Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro has Android 12.
The Google Pixel 4a 5G features a little sharper display than Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro, because although it has a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels and a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a just a bit better quantity of pixels per display inch. The Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro has a lot bigger storage for games and applications than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because it has 256 GB internal storage.
Google Pixel 4a 5G has a much powerful CPU than Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor. The Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro features a much better camera than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has a smaller camera sensor giving a worse image quality and a tinier diafragm aperture which is not favorable for taking images or videos in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same (4K) video definition and the same 60 fps video frame rate, the Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro also counts with a camera with way more megapixels.
Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro counts with greater battery lifetime than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because it has 4650mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.