Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.5 | 82.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 11 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-11-19 | 2019-06-17 |
| 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches | 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| Clearly white and Just black | Carbon Black, Flame Red and Glacier Blue |
| Plastic | Metal and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 500.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 416 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| -- | 430 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3885mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.84 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4a 5G is a little bit better than the Xiaomi Mi 9T, having a overall score of 87.5 against 82.2. Google Pixel 4a 5G is a newer phone, and it is also a little bit thinner and lighter than the Xiaomi Mi 9T. These phones work with Android OS, but Google Pixel 4a 5G has a newer 11 version and Xiaomi Mi 9T has Android 10 version, giving you some nice extra features.
The Google Pixel 4a 5G counts with a bit more powerful processor than Xiaomi Mi 9T. They have a Octa-Core processor and 6 GB of RAM. Xiaomi Mi 9T features a bit better looking display than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has a just a bit worse screen density, and they both have the same exact resolution of 1080 x 2340, the Xiaomi Mi 9T also counts with a little larger display.
The Xiaomi Mi 9T and Google Pixel 4a 5G count with similar storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos, both have the same internal storage. Xiaomi Mi 9T has a better camera than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has worse video frame rates and a smaller diafragm aperture which is not recommended for low light photos and videos, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Xiaomi Mi 9T also counts with a lot more mega pixels back facing camera and a much larger back-facing camera sensor capturing much better quality videos and pictures.
Xiaomi Mi 9T has a bit superior battery life than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.