Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.5 | 82.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 11 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-11-19 | 2019-08-20 |
| 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches | 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| Clearly white and Just black | Carbon black, Glacier blue and Red flame |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 500.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 416 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| -- | 430 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3885mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.84 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4a 5G has a score of 87.5, which is slightly better than Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro's global score of 82.7. Both of these phones come with Android operating system, but Google Pixel 4a 5G has the newer 11 version and Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro has Android 10, so it provides a lot of extra features. The Google Pixel 4a 5G is a newer device, and it's also just a little bit thinner and lighter than Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro.
The Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro has a little bit better performance than Google Pixel 4a 5G. They have the same RAM amount and the same number of cores. The Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro features a bit better looking screen than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has a bit lower screen pixel density, and they both have the same 1080 x 2340 resolution, the Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro also counts with a quite larger display.
The Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro features a much better camera than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not nice for low light photography and video, and they both have the same 60 fps video frame rate and the same video definition, the Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro also counts with a lot bigger sensor and a lot more mega pixels back camera.
Google Pixel 4a 5G and Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro count with similar memory to install games and applications, they have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage. The Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro counts with a bit longer battery life than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 3885mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.