Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.5 | 77.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2020-11-19 | 2017-06-01 |
| 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches | 6.85 x 3.49 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 7.44 ounces |
| Clearly white and Just black | Black and Gold |
| Plastic | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 500.00 | $ 295.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 416 pixels per inch | 344 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 7.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 12.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Micro SIM |
| 10.7 | 6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3885mAh Battery | 5300mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.84 | 7.04 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4a 5G is much better than Xiaomi Mi Max 2, with an 87.5 score against 77.5. The Google Pixel 4a 5G design is extremely newer and lighter than the Xiaomi Mi Max 2's, but it is also a little bit thicker. The Google Pixel 4a 5G has a little faster CPU than Xiaomi Mi Max 2, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Google Pixel 4a 5G also has more RAM memory.
The Google Pixel 4a 5G features a little sharper screen than Xiaomi Mi Max 2, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2340px and a little bit greater pixel count per inch in the screen. The Xiaomi Mi Max 2 has a much better storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Pixel 4a 5G, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Xiaomi Mi Max 2 also has an external memory slot that supports a maximum of 128 GB.
The Xiaomi Mi Max 2 features a superior battery lifetime than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because it has a 36 percent bigger battery size. The Google Pixel 4a 5G has just a bit better camera than Xiaomi Mi Max 2, and although they both have the same video quality, the Google Pixel 4a 5G also has a larger back-facing camera sensor which provides a better image and video quality, a higher 12.2 megapixels resolution camera in the back, a much larger aperture to take better captures and video in poorly lited environments and better 60 frames per second video frame rates.
The Google Pixel 4a 5G is way more expensive than Xiaomi Mi Max 2, but you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.