Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.5 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2020-11-19 | 2017-10-10 |
| 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches | 5.98 x 2.97 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Clearly white and Just black | Black |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 500.00 | $ 614.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 416 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3885mAh Battery | 3400mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.84 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4a 5G has an overall score of 87.5, which is a little bit better than the Xiaomi Mi MIX 2's overall score of 81.2. The Google Pixel 4a 5G body is way newer and a bit lighter, but also just a bit thicker than the Xiaomi Mi MIX 2. Xiaomi Mi MIX 2 has just a little better hardware performance than Google Pixel 4a 5G. They have 8 CPU cores and the same RAM amount.
Google Pixel 4a 5G features a little sharper display than Xiaomi Mi MIX 2, because it has a slightly better 1080 x 2340 resolution, a just a bit higher screen density and a little bit larger screen. Google Pixel 4a 5G captures a bit better photographs and videos than Xiaomi Mi MIX 2, and although they both have the same video resolution, the Google Pixel 4a 5G also has better 60 fps video frame rates, a back camera with a higher 12.2 mega-pixels resolution, a larger sensor which gives a higher image and video quality and a larger camera aperture.
The Xiaomi Mi MIX 2 counts with a lot bigger memory to store more apps and games than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity. Google Pixel 4a 5G features a little longer battery lifetime than Xiaomi Mi MIX 2, because it has a 3885mAh battery capacity.
Even being the best phone in this comparison, the Google Pixel 4a 5G is also very cheap compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.