Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.5 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2020-11-19 | 2018-04-03 |
| 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches | 5.94 x 2.95 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Clearly white and Just black | Black and White |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 500.00 | $ 639.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 416 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3885mAh Battery | 3400mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.84 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4a 5G has an overall score of 87.5, which is a bit better than the Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s's score of 83.8. The Google Pixel 4a 5G is a lighter phone than the Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, but they are equally thin. The Google Pixel 4a 5G has a little more vivid display than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, because it has a slightly better 1080 x 2340 resolution, a quite bigger screen and a little higher pixel quantity in each inch in the display.
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s has a very superior memory capacity to install applications and games than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity. The Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s counts with a bit better performance than Google Pixel 4a 5G, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
The Google Pixel 4a 5G counts with a little longer battery duration than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, because it has a 14% bigger battery size. The Google Pixel 4a 5G captures a little bit better videos and photos than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, and although they both have a same size sensor and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Google Pixel 4a 5G also has a larger diafragm aperture to take better low-light images, a camera in the back with more megapixels and higher video frame rates.
Despite of being the best phone between the ones we are comparing, Google Pixel 4a 5G is also very cheap compared to the other devices.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.