Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.5 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2020-11-19 | 2018-11-01 |
| 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches | 6.22 x 2.94 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 7.69 ounces |
| Clearly white and Just black | Black, Blue and Green |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 500.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 416 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| -- | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3885mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.84 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4a 5G has an overall score of 87.5, which is slightly better than the Xiaomi Mi Mix 3's 83.8 score. The Google Pixel 4a 5G construction is extremely newer, just a little thinner and noticeably lighter than Xiaomi Mi Mix 3. Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 features a little sharper screen than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has a just a little lower screen density, and they both have exactly the same 1080 x 2340 resolution, the Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 also counts with a little larger display.
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 counts with a little bit better hardware performance than Google Pixel 4a 5G, and although they both have 8 cores, the Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 also has a larger amount of RAM memory. The Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 shoots a bit better pictures and videos than Google Pixel 4a 5G, although it has a tinier aperture, they both have the same video resolution, a same size back-facing camera sensor, the same video frame rates and a same resolution back-facing camera.
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 features a very superior storage capacity to store more apps and games than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because it has 256 GB internal memory. The Google Pixel 4a 5G features superior battery performance than Xiaomi Mi Mix 3, because it has a 3885mAh battery size instead of 3200mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.