Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.5 | 84.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 11 | Android 14 |
| 2020-11-19 | 2024-07-19 |
| 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches | 6.28 x 5.64 x 0.18 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 7.97 ounces |
| Clearly white and Just black | Black, Blue and White |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 500.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2488 x 2224 pixels |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 416 pixels per inch | 417 pixels per inch |
| -- | 3000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 10 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.49") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 12.54 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3885mAh Battery | 5100mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.84 | 6.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4a 5G has a score of 87.5, which is a bit better than the Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4's general score of 84.3. The Google Pixel 4a 5G construction is notably lighter than the Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4, but it is a lot thicker and was released many years before. These devices use Android operating system, but Google Pixel 4a 5G has older 11 version and Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 has Android 14.
Google Pixel 4a 5G counts with a really superior processing power than Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores. Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 has a much better display than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because it has a bigger display, a bit greater pixels count in each screen inch and a lot higher 2224 x 2488 resolution.
Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 has a greater camera than Google Pixel 4a 5G, and although they both have the same diafragm aperture, the Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 also has a much larger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors, a much higher resolution back camera and a much higher 7680x4320 video resolution.
Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 counts with a way bigger storage for games and applications than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because it has 256 GB internal memory capacity. The Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 features longer battery lifetime than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because it has a 5100mAh battery capacity instead of 3885mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.