Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.5 | 76 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 11 | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2020-11-19 | 2016-11-01 |
| 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches | 6.15 x 3.04 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Clearly white and Just black | Black and Silver |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 500.00 | $ 516.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| OLED | OLED |
| 416 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 23.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 8.69 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3885mAh Battery | 4070mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.84 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4a 5G has a global score of 87.5, which is much better than the Xiaomi Mi Note 2's 76 global score. The Google Pixel 4a 5G is a incredibly newer device than Xiaomi Mi Note 2, although it is just a little bit thicker and a little bit heavier. These phones include Android OS (Operating System), but the Google Pixel 4a 5G has the older 11 version while Xiaomi Mi Note 2 has Android 6.0 Marshmallow version.
The Google Pixel 4a 5G counts with a slightly better display than Xiaomi Mi Note 2, because it has a little bigger display, a just a little greater pixels amount per inch of screen and a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels. The Xiaomi Mi Note 2's storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos is very similar to Google Pixel 4a 5G's one, they have the same 128 GB internal storage.
Google Pixel 4a 5G counts with a little bit better performance than Xiaomi Mi Note 2, and although they both have 6 GB of RAM memory, the Google Pixel 4a 5G also has a greater number of cores. Xiaomi Mi Note 2 features just a bit longer battery life than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because it has a 5 percent greater battery capacity.
The Google Pixel 4a 5G counts with a superior camera than Xiaomi Mi Note 2, because although it has a lot less mega pixels camera and a lower (4K) video definition, it also counts with a larger aperture and a larger back camera sensor.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, Google Pixel 4a 5G is also cheaper than the Xiaomi Mi Note 2, which makes buying this phone a simple decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.