Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.5 | 78.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 11 | Android 10 |
| 2020-11-19 | 2020-07-14 |
| 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Clearly white and Just black | Green and Greener, Out of the Blue and Two Shades of Black |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 500.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 416 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3885mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.84 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4a 5G is better than the Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro, getting an 87.5 score against 78.7. Although the Google Pixel 4a 5G and the Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro were only released with a couple months difference, the Google Pixel 4a 5G is a little thinner and lighter. Both phones in this comparison review have Android OS, but Google Pixel 4a 5G has a more recent 11 version while Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro has Android 10 version, providing the user a couple nice extra features.
Google Pixel 4a 5G features a bit better CPU than Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Google Pixel 4a 5G also has 2 GB more RAM memory. Google Pixel 4a 5G counts with a little sharper screen than Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro, because although it has a quite smaller screen and a bit lower 1080 x 2340 resolution, it also counts with a just a bit more pixels per inch in the screen.
The Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro takes a bit better photographs and videos than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has lower 30 fps video frame rate and a smaller diafragm aperture which is not recommended for capturing photographs and videos in low-light environments, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro also counts with a back facing camera with a lot better 48 MP resolution.
The Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro has a greater memory capacity to store more apps and games than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that supports up to 512 GB. Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro counts with greater battery duration than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because it has a 5000mAh battery size instead of 3885mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.