Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.5 | 78.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 11 | Android 10 |
| 2020-11-19 | 2021-01-18 |
| 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches | 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.38 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Clearly white and Just black | Carbon gray, Ocean green, Sunrise orange and Twilight blue |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 500.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 416 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3885mAh Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.84 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4a 5G is better than Xiaomi Redmi 9T, having a general score of 87.5 against 78.2. Even though the Google Pixel 4a 5G and the Xiaomi Redmi 9T were released only a couple of months apart, the Google Pixel 4a 5G is lighter and thinner. Both of these devices use Android operating system, but Google Pixel 4a 5G has a newer 11 version while Xiaomi Redmi 9T has Android 10.
Google Pixel 4a 5G counts with a bit faster processor than Xiaomi Redmi 9T, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Google Pixel 4a 5G also has 2 GB more RAM. Google Pixel 4a 5G counts with a bit more vivid screen than Xiaomi Redmi 9T, because although it has a bit smaller display, and they both have exactly the same resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels, the Google Pixel 4a 5G also counts with a quite greater pixel density.
Xiaomi Redmi 9T features a greater memory capacity for games and applications than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD extension slot that allows up to 512 GB. Xiaomi Redmi 9T shoots clearer photos and videos than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not so good for low light photography and lower video frame rate, and they both have the same 1920x1080 video definition, the Xiaomi Redmi 9T also counts with a lot better 48 MP resolution camera in the back and a lot larger sensor taking much higher quality photos.
The Xiaomi Redmi 9T counts with a much longer battery life than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity against 3885mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.