Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.5 | 82.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 11 | Android 11 |
| 2020-11-19 | 2021-03-24 |
| 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches | 6.46 x 3.01 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Clearly white and Just black | Glacier Blue, Gradient Bronze and Onyx Gray |
| Plastic | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 500.00 | $ 279.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 416 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150-AC chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3885mAh Battery | 5020mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.84 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4a 5G is a bit better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro, with a score of 87.5 against 82.4. The Google Pixel 4a 5G construction has the same thickness than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro, but it's lighter. Both devices we compare here work with the same Android 11 OS (operating system), so you shouldn't notice any differences in that aspect.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro's processing unit is just as good as the Google Pixel 4a 5G one, both of them have a 6 GB RAM memory and 8 cores. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro has a little sharper screen than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has a just a bit worse pixel amount in each inch in the screen, it also counts with a quite larger display and a quite better 1080 x 2400 resolution.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro captures much better photos and videos than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has worse 30 fps video frame rates and a tinier aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro also counts with a camera in the back with much more mega pixels.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro counts with a bigger memory for games and applications than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external memory slot that allows up to 512 GB. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro features improved battery lifetime than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because it has a 29% more battery size.
Although Google Pixel 4a 5G is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro. So if you need that extra features, you can buy Google Pixel 4a 5G, but if you don't you can save a couple dollars and get the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro, letting go a couple features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.