Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.5 | 86.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 11 | Android 11 |
| 2020-11-19 | -- |
| 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches | 6.44 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| Clearly white and Just black | -- |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 500.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 2080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 416 pixels per inch | 474 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 920 MT6877T (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3885mAh Battery | 5160mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.84 | 6.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4a 5G is slightly better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro, getting a score of 87.5 against 86.1. Google Pixel 4a 5G is a lighter and a bit thinner cellphone than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro. Both of these devices come with the same Android 11 OS. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro features a little bit better looking display than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because it has a just a bit better pixels amount in each display inch, a quite bigger display and a better resolution of 2080 x 2400px.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro counts with as much memory for apps and games as the Google Pixel 4a 5G one, they have the same 128 GB internal storage capacity. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro counts with a little better processing power than Google Pixel 4a 5G. Both have the same number of cores and a 6 GB RAM memory.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro shoots better photos and videos than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has a tinier aperture which is worse for low light photography and lower video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro also counts with a lot more mega pixels back facing camera.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro features improved battery lifetime than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because it has 5160mAh of battery capacity against 3885mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.