Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.5 | 77.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 11 | Android 11 |
| 2020-11-19 | -- |
| 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches | 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 7.13 ounces |
| Clearly white and Just black | Atlantic Blue, Graphite Gray and Polar White |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 500.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 2080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 416 pixels per inch | 474 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665G SM6375 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3885mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.84 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4a 5G is better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G, with an 87.5 score against 77.1. Google Pixel 4a 5G is a lighter cellphone than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G, but they have the same thickness. Both devices in this review use the same Android 11 OS (operating system), so you shouldn't perceive any difference regarding that.
The Google Pixel 4a 5G counts with a lot better processing power than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G. Both have 6 GB of RAM memory and 8 cores. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G has a better display than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because it has a little bit higher count of pixels per inch in the screen, a little bigger screen and a better resolution of 2080 x 2400px.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G counts with a lot bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that admits up to 1 TB. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G counts with better battery duration than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G takes much clearer photos and videos than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has slower 30 fps video frame rate and a smaller diafragm aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G also counts with a lot higher 108 megapixels resolution back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.