Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.5 | 77.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 11 | Android 8.1 Oreo |
| 2020-11-19 | 2018-11-23 |
| 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches | 6.22 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.42 ounces |
| Clearly white and Just black | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic | Metal and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 500.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 416 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 509 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3885mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.84 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4a 5G is much better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro, getting a general score of 87.5 against 77.2. The Google Pixel 4a 5G is a newer cellphone, and it is also just a bit thinner and just a little lighter than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro. Both of these phones work with Android operating system, but the Google Pixel 4a 5G has the older 11 version while Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro has Android 8.1 Oreo version.
Google Pixel 4a 5G counts with a little faster CPU than Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro. They have 8 cpu cores and a 6 GB RAM memory. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro counts with a bit more vivid screen than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has a little lower display pixel density and a little worse 1080 x 2280px resolution, it also counts with a quite larger screen.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro features slightly more memory capacity for games and applications than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that allows up to 256 GB. Google Pixel 4a 5G features a better camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro, and although they both have a 0.39 inches sensor, the Google Pixel 4a 5G also has a camera in the back with more mega-pixels, a much better (4K) video definition and a bigger camera aperture to capture better images in low light environments.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro features a little longer battery performance than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because it has a 3 percent bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.