Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.5 | 83 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 11 | Android 10 |
| 2020-11-19 | 2021-01-18 |
| 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches | 6.37 x 3.04 x 0.36 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Clearly white and Just black | Daybreak purple and Nightfall black |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 500.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 416 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 800U chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A76 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3885mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.84 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4a 5G has a global score of 87.5, which is slightly better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T's 83 global score. The Google Pixel 4a 5G construction is lighter and thinner than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T, although both were only released with a couple months difference. Both devices we are comparing have Android OS, but Google Pixel 4a 5G has a newer 11 version while Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T has Android 10, so it gives you a lot of extra features and optimized performance.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T's processor is very similar to Google Pixel 4a 5G's processor, and although the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T has 2 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. The Google Pixel 4a 5G has a little more vivid display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T, because although it has a quite smaller screen, and they both have the same exact 1080 x 2340 resolution, the Google Pixel 4a 5G also counts with a just a bit higher pixels count in each inch in the screen.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T features a superior camera than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has worse 30 frames per second video frame rate and a tinier diafragm aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T also counts with a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor taking way higher quality photographs and a way better 48 megapixels resolution back-facing camera.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T counts with a quite bigger memory to store more games and applications than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with a SD card slot that admits up to 512 GB. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T has longer battery duration than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 3885mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.