Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.9 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | |
| Android 11, 10 | iOS 15.x, 14.x, 13.x |
| 2020-08-20 | 2019-09-20 |
| 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches | 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Just black | Black, Green, Purple, Red, White and Yellow |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 349.00 | $ 699.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1792 x 828 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 444 pixels per inch | 324 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset | Apple A13 Bionic APL1W85 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | 64-bit Lightning and Thunder, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2650 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Apple-designed 4 core GPU |
| 9.27 | 10.35 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3110mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.12 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone 11 is a little bit better than the Google Pixel 4a, with a global score of 83.3 against 82.9. IPhone 11's body is older, a little thicker and extremely heavier than the Google Pixel 4a. IPhone 11 works with iOS 15.x operating system, while Google Pixel 4a counts with Android 11 operating system.
The Google Pixel 4a counts with a little sharper screen than iPhone 11, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with more pixels per display inch and a better resolution of 1080 x 2340. The Google Pixel 4a counts with a very superior memory capacity for games and applications than iPhone 11, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity.
Apple iPhone 11 has a quite superior performance than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has an inferior number of cores and a smaller amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a 64-bit processing unit. The Apple iPhone 11 counts with a bit better camera than Google Pixel 4a, although it has a worse (4K) video definition, a tinier camera aperture and a lower 12 megapixels resolution back facing camera, they both have a 0.39 inches sensor.
Google Pixel 4a and iPhone 11 have similar batteries duration, although the iPhone 11 has a 1 percent lower battery capacity.
Although iPhone 11 is a better device, it costs a lot more than Google Pixel 4a, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Google Pixel 4a. So if you want that extra specs and features, you can buy the iPhone 11, but if you don't you can save some dollars and buy the Google Pixel 4a, giving up a couple specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.