Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.9 | 85.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | |
| Android 11, 10 | iOS 15.x, 14.x, 13.x |
| 2020-08-20 | 2019-09-20 |
| 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches | 6.22 x 3.06 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 7.97 ounces |
| Just black | Gold, Midnight green, Silver and Space gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 349.00 | $ 1099.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2688 x 1242 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 444 pixels per inch | 456 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset | Apple A13 Bionic APL1W85 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | 64-bit Lightning and Thunder, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2650 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Apple-designed 4 core GPU |
| 9.27 | 10.35 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3969mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.12 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max has a score of 85.3, which is just a bit better than Google Pixel 4a's 82.9 score. The Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max comes with iOS 15.x OS, and Google Pixel 4a has Android 11 OS. The Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max is a a lot heavier cellphone than Google Pixel 4a, but both are equally thin.
The iPhone 11 Pro Max has a quite superior processing power than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM and a lower number of cores , it also counts with a 64 bits processing unit. The iPhone 11 Pro Max features a bit better looking display than Google Pixel 4a, because it has a just a bit better pixel count in each inch of display, a slightly better resolution of 1242 x 2688 pixels and a bit larger display.
The iPhone 11 Pro Max takes a bit better videos and photos than Google Pixel 4a, although it has a lesser megapixels back camera, a worse 3840x2160 video quality and a tinier diafragm aperture which is not so good for low light captures and video, they both have a same size sensor. The Google Pixel 4a has a much bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max, because it has 64 GB more internal memory.
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max counts with greater battery lifetime than Google Pixel 4a, because it has 3969mAh of battery capacity.
Although iPhone 11 Pro Max is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Google Pixel 4a, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Google Pixel 4a. If you are trying to save some dollars, you can get Google Pixel 4a, giving up a few features and specs, but you'll get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.