Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.9 | 91.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | |
| Android 11, 10 | iOS 15.x |
| 2020-08-20 | 2021-09-24 |
| 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches | 5.78 x 2.81 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Just black | Blue, Midnight, Pink, Red and Starlight |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 349.00 | $ 799.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2532 x 1170 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 444 pixels per inch | 457 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset | Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | 64-bit Hexa-Core 3240 MHz processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.27 | 10.62 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3227mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.12 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone 13 has a general score of 91.5, which is better than the Google Pixel 4a's 82.9 overall score. Apple iPhone 13's design is newer and just a little thinner than the Google Pixel 4a's, but it is also somewhat heavier. The Apple iPhone 13 counts with iOS 15.x OS, while Google Pixel 4a comes with Android 11 OS.
The iPhone 13 has a more powerful processor than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has 2 GB less RAM memory and 2 lesser processing cores (but faster), it also counts with a 64-bits CPU. The iPhone 13 has a better looking screen than Google Pixel 4a, because it has a little greater screen pixel density, a quite better 1170 x 2532px resolution and a quite bigger screen.
The Apple iPhone 13 counts with a slightly better camera than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has a worse 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a worse 12 mega pixels resolution camera in the back, it also counts with a bigger aperture to take better low-light images and videos. IPhone 13 counts with as much storage capacity for applications and games as the Google Pixel 4a, both have equal 128 GB internal storage.
IPhone 13 has a bit superior battery performance than Google Pixel 4a, because it has 3227mAh of battery capacity instead of 3140mAh.
Although iPhone 13 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Google Pixel 4a, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Google Pixel 4a. So if you want that extra specs, you can buy iPhone 13, else you can save some dollars and get the Google Pixel 4a, letting go a couple specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.