Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.9 | 93.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | |
| Android 11, 10 | iOS 15.x |
| 2020-08-20 | 2021-09-24 |
| 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches | 5.78 x 2.81 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 7.20 ounces |
| Just black | Gold, Graphite, Sierra Blue and Silver |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 349.00 | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2532 x 1170 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 444 pixels per inch | 457 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset | Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | 64-bit Hexa-Core 3240 MHz processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.27 | 10.71 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3095mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.12 | 5.04 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone 13 Pro is better than the Google Pixel 4a, with a overall score of 93.3 against 82.9. The iPhone 13 Pro is a newer and just a little thinner cellphone than the Google Pixel 4a, but it's a lot heavier. The iPhone 13 Pro comes with iOS 15.x OS, and Google Pixel 4a counts with Android 11 OS. The Apple iPhone 13 Pro counts with a faster CPU than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has an inferior number of cores , and they both have 6 GB of RAM memory, the Apple iPhone 13 Pro also counts with a 64 bits processing unit.
IPhone 13 Pro features a sharper screen than Google Pixel 4a, because it has a little bit higher 1170 x 2532 resolution, a quite greater pixel count in each screen inch and a bit bigger screen. The Apple iPhone 13 Pro shoots just a bit better pictures and videos than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has a lower video quality and a lesser mega pixels back facing camera, it also counts with a bigger aperture.
IPhone 13 Pro's memory to store more games and applications is very similar to the Google Pixel 4a one, they have equal 128 GB internal storage capacity. Google Pixel 4a features a little longer battery performance than iPhone 13 Pro, because it has 3140mAh of battery capacity.
Although Apple iPhone 13 Pro is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Google Pixel 4a, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Google Pixel 4a. So if you want that extra features and specs, you can buy the Apple iPhone 13 Pro, but if you don't you can save some money and get the Google Pixel 4a, resigning a couple features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.