Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.9 | 93.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | |
| Android 11, 10 | iOS 15.x |
| 2020-08-20 | 2021-09-24 |
| 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches | 6.33 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 8.47 ounces |
| Just black | Gold, Graphite, Sierra Blue and Silver |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 349.00 | $ 1099.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2778 x 1284 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 444 pixels per inch | 457 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset | Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | 64-bit Hexa-Core 3240 MHz processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.27 | 10.71 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4352mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.12 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max has a general score of 93.2, which is much better than the Google Pixel 4a's 82.9 general score. Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max's design is newer and just a little thinner, but extremely heavier than Google Pixel 4a. The Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max has iOS 15.x OS, and Google Pixel 4a counts with Android 11 OS.
The iPhone 13 Pro Max has just a bit better display than Google Pixel 4a, because it has a just a little higher screen pixels density, a bigger screen and a higher 1284 x 2778 resolution. The Google Pixel 4a and the Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max feature very similar memory to install applications and games, both have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage capacity.
The Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max counts with a better processing power than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has lesser cores , and they both have the same RAM memory amount, the Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max also counts with a 64-bit processing unit. Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max features a really longer battery life than Google Pixel 4a, because it has a 39 percent more battery size.
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max counts with just a bit better camera than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has a lesser MP resolution back facing camera and a worse 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, it also counts with a larger aperture to take better photos and video in poorly lited environments.
Although iPhone 13 Pro Max is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Google Pixel 4a, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Google Pixel 4a. So if you want that extra features and specs, you can buy iPhone 13 Pro Max, otherwise you can save some money and get the Google Pixel 4a, resigning some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.