Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.9 | 95.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | |
| Android 11, 10 | iOS 16.x |
| 2020-08-20 | 2022-09-16 |
| 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches | 5.81 x 2.81 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 7.27 ounces |
| Just black | Deep Purple, Gold, Silver and Space Black |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 349.00 | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2556 x 1179 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 444 pixels per inch | 461 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 9.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset | Apple A16 Bionic (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | 64-bit Hexa-Core 3460 MHz processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Apple GPU 5-core GPU |
| 9.27 | 10.8 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11.33 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | -- |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3200mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.12 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone 14 Pro is better than the Google Pixel 4a, with a global score of 95.6 against 82.9. IPhone 14 Pro's body is much newer and just a little thinner, but also noticeably heavier than the Google Pixel 4a. IPhone 14 Pro works with iOS 16.x operating system, and Google Pixel 4a works with Android 11 operating system.
The Apple iPhone 14 Pro counts with a superior hardware performance than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has 2 lesser CPU cores , and they both have 6 GB of RAM, the Apple iPhone 14 Pro also counts with a 64 bits processing unit. Apple iPhone 14 Pro counts with a better looking screen than Google Pixel 4a, because it has a bit larger screen, a bit higher 1179 x 2556 resolution and a just a little better pixels number in each display inch.
IPhone 14 Pro features as much storage for applications, games, photos and videos as the Google Pixel 4a one, both of them have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory capacity. IPhone 14 Pro counts with a little better battery lifetime than Google Pixel 4a, because it has a 3200mAh battery capacity against 3140mAh.
The Apple iPhone 14 Pro shoots much better pictures and videos than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture, and they both have the same video quality, the Apple iPhone 14 Pro also counts with a back-facing camera with way more megapixels and faster video frame rates.
Although iPhone 14 Pro is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Google Pixel 4a, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Google Pixel 4a. If you prefer to save some money, you can buy Google Pixel 4a, giving up a couple features and specs, but you will get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.