Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.9 | 94.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | |
| Android 11, 10 | iOS 16.x |
| 2020-08-20 | 2022-09-16 |
| 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches | 6.33 x 3.05 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 8.47 ounces |
| Just black | Deep Purple, Gold, Silver and Space Black |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 349.00 | $ 1099.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2796 x 1290 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 444 pixels per inch | 460 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset | Apple 16 Bionic (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | 64-bit Hexa-Core 3460 MHz processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Apple GPU 5-core GPU |
| 9.27 | 10.8 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11.33 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | -- |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4323mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.12 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max has an overall score of 94.9, which is much better than the Google Pixel 4a's overall score of 82.9. Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max's construction is newer and a bit thinner, but a lot heavier than the Google Pixel 4a. The Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max has iOS 16.x operating system, and Google Pixel 4a works with Android 11 operating system.
IPhone 14 Pro Max has a superior hardware performance than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has a lower number of cores (although faster), and they both have a 6 GB RAM memory, the iPhone 14 Pro Max also counts with a 64-bits processing unit. The iPhone 14 Pro Max features a little more vivid screen than Google Pixel 4a, because it has a little bit higher display pixel density, a bigger screen and a higher 1290 x 2796 pixels resolution.
The iPhone 14 Pro Max shoots much better photos and videos than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not nice for taking pictures or videos in low-light environments, and they both have the same video resolution, the iPhone 14 Pro Max also counts with better 60 frames per second video frame rates and a back-facing camera with lot more mega-pixels.
Google Pixel 4a and iPhone 14 Pro Max both have extremely similar memory capacity to install games and applications, they have the same 128 GB internal storage. Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max features a much better battery lifetime than Google Pixel 4a, because it has 4323mAh of battery capacity.
Although iPhone 14 Pro Max is a better device, it is way more expensive than Google Pixel 4a, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Google Pixel 4a. If you prefer to save some money, you can get the Google Pixel 4a, letting go a few features and specs, but you'll get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.