Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.9 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-08-20 | 2017-11-03 |
| 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Just black | Silver and Space gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 349.00 | $ 1149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 444 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 9.27 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.12 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone X has a global score of 88.1, which is slightly better than Google Pixel 4a's 82.9 overall score. Although the iPhone X is extremely older and somewhat heavier than the Google Pixel 4a, it's design is still a bit thinner. IPhone X features just a bit better looking display than Google Pixel 4a, and although they both have a same size display, the iPhone X also has a little greater number of pixels per inch of display and a slightly better 1125 x 2436 resolution.
IPhone X has a bit superior CPU than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM and a lower number of cores , it also counts with a 64-bits processor. IPhone X captures a bit better photos and videos than Google Pixel 4a, although it has a camera with a worse 12 mega-pixels resolution, a tinier back camera sensor which gives a worse image and video quality, a worse video resolution and a smaller aperture.
Apple iPhone X counts with a much bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Google Pixel 4a, because it has 128 GB more internal storage capacity. The Google Pixel 4a counts with just a little bit longer battery duration than Apple iPhone X, because it has a 3140mAh battery size instead of 2716mAh.
Although iPhone X is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Google Pixel 4a, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Google Pixel 4a. If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can buy the Google Pixel 4a, and give up some specs and features, but you will get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.