Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.9 | 82.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-08-20 | -- |
| 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches | -- |
| 5.04 ounces | -- |
| Just black | -- |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 349.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2480 x 220 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 444 pixels per inch | 311 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 6.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset | Google Tensor G4 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | -- |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.12 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4a is just a bit better than Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored), getting a score of 82.9 against 82.2. Both phones in our current comparison include Android OS (Operating System), but Google Pixel 4a has the previous 11 version and Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored) has Android 14. The Google Pixel 4a has a much faster CPU than Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored), although it has less RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
The Google Pixel 4a counts with an incredibly better screen than Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored), because although it has a way smaller display, it also counts with a much better 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution and more pixels per inch in the display. Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored) features much more storage for games and applications than Google Pixel 4a, because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity.
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored) features just a bit better camera than Google Pixel 4a, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored) also has faster 60 fps video frame rates and a back camera with way more MP. Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored) has a much better battery lifetime than Google Pixel 4a, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 3140mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.