Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.9 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-08-20 | 2021-06-25 |
| 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches | 6.44 x 2.94 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Just black | Amber Red, Emerald Green, Frost Crystal and Midnight Black |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 349.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2676 x 1236 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 444 pixels per inch | 440 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 670, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 17.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.12 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4a is a little bit better than the Honor 50 Pro, having a overall score of 82.9 against 77. The Google Pixel 4a is an older and a little bit thicker phone than the Honor 50 Pro, but Google made it way lighter anyway. Both phones in this review have the same Android 11 operating system.
Honor 50 Pro features a bit superior processing unit than Google Pixel 4a, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Honor 50 Pro also has 2 GB more RAM memory. Honor 50 Pro has a display that's just as good as Google Pixel 4a's display, because although the Honor 50 Pro has a just a little lower count of pixels per display inch, it also counts with a bit higher resolution of 1236 x 2676 and a bigger display.
The Honor 50 Pro features a superior memory capacity to install games and applications than Google Pixel 4a, because it has 128 GB more internal storage capacity. Honor 50 Pro takes much better videos and photos than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has a tinier aperture which is worse for low-light photos, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Honor 50 Pro also counts with a camera with a way higher 108 megapixels resolution.
The Honor 50 Pro features improved battery life than Google Pixel 4a, because it has a 4000mAh battery size against 3140mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.